WHEN THE SYSTEM BREAKS DOWN
In June of 1996, Rachelle
and Lee Henry had their life turned upside down by the Department of Children
and Family Services (DCFS). Mr. and
Mrs. Henry are foster parents and one of their eight foster children was taken
from them; the rest were taken in November.
All of these children were born addicted to drugs and with medical
conditions ranging from cerebral palsy to mental retardation to AIDS.
How and why did this
occur? Early in 1996, the Henrys who
are grandparents and whose four birth children are grown up and out of the
house, moved from Pomona to Lancaster.
At their new home they were assigned a new DCFS social worker for their
youngest child, a three year old drug-addicted baby who is HIV positive.
Earlier in June, the three
year old was taken to the Emergency Room at Antelope Valley Hospital where she
was treated by a pediatrician named Gerard G. Edralin. According to Juvenile Court records, the
child was hospitalized as a result of her alleged adverse reaction "to
ingestion of psychotropic drugs Phenothiazine, Haldol, and Tegritol."
Obviously, if a woman is
poisoning her children with psychotropic drugs, removing the children from her
home followed by criminal prosecution for attempted murder or at the very least
battery would be appropriate. The
problem here is that Dr. Edralin can't understand how the Juvenile Court could
reach the above conclusion when according to his letter to the Court he
informed DCFS that the three year old he treated showed no evidence of
ingesting any medication whatsoever.
His letter stated in part:
"You can't imagine how utterly appalled and disturbed I was when I
received a copy of the Juvenile Court petition which stated in effect that the
child was taken away from the home of her legal guardian, Rachelle A. Henry,
because it was thought that she had ingested [drugs]. This is an utter falsehood, and whoever made these irresponsible
statements is either a complete idiot, or else is trying desperately to damage
the name and reputation of Mrs. Henry."
Mrs. Henry acknowledged
that when they moved from Pomona to Lancaster in 1995 she did not get along
very well with the new DCFS social worker who was assigned to their young
child. Mrs. Henry admits there was a
personality conflict, yet somehow this has led to a bench officer removing
these children from the only loving, caring home they have ever known. The Henrys have spent the last year and a
half attempting to regain custody of their foster children. Previous DCFS social workers and medical
practitioners who worked with the Henrys over the last twelve years have rallied
to their support. On the medical front,
there are letters from Dr. Joseph A. Church and Dr. Ronald M. Ferdman of
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, who both indicated that Rachelle Henry has
been a responsible, caring parent. One
DCFS social worker who had previously worked with the Henrys, speaking on
condition of anonymity, describes the atmosphere in the Henry home as one in
which the children were given the utmost treatment and love. Another DCFS social worker who had overseen
the Henry children for almost ten years was absolutely amazed at the
fact that these children were being ripped out of the Henry household as he
stated, "Mrs. Henry loved those kids a lot and I didn't have [any]
problems with that lady. The Judge never
subpoenaed me. They took the case from
me and put another worker on it."
A supervising social worker whose task it was to accompany law
enforcement in the gathering up of the Henry foster children, couldn't figure
out what she was doing there. While
acknowledging her visit to the Henry home was a brief one, she stated as
follows: "We have to make quick
assessments in a short amount of time, and I didn't perceive wrong there...I
didn't see any neglect. It seemed to me
she was taking real good care of them."
What has made the regaining
of their foster children so difficult for the Henrys is that a Court-appointed
psychologist has "diagnosed" the foster mother as having something
known as the "Good Mother Syndrome" also known as Munchausen Syndrome
By Proxy. This somewhat controversial
diagnosis within the psychological community was first put forth in 1977 by a
British pediatrician who defined this situation as one in which a mother
intentionally harms her child to gain attention for herself.
Why has this allegation
been made against Mrs. Henry if it is not true? Tom Ryan, considered the leading legal expert in this area, looks
at the Henry situation with disbelief.
He says that "allegations of Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy arise
'when a mother with a chronically ill child advocates for her child.' It's an
effective way to get rid of a mother.
...[T]he diagnosis is becoming more common and it is often used in
response to charges of medical malpractice or in custody battles." Ryan analogizes this to the old
"Twinkie Defense," which fortunately hasn't been seen in this State
for many years.
All of the medical
professionals who have reviewed this file feel that whether or not Rachelle
Henry has significant problems rests on the quality of the Court-ordered
psychological evaluation which must include
extensive objective psychological testing along with numerous
interviews. In this case, the
evaluation of Mrs. Henry consisted of an interview by the Court-ordered
psychologist that lasted less than two hours!
This matter is now set for
trial in January; however, the Henrys don't believe that they will have their
day in court anytime soon. Since the
children were removed from the Henry home, the Henrys have retained their legal
guardianship of the children, no criminal or civil charges have been filed
against them, and while the Court has permitted visitation, Rachelle Henry
indicates that they have only been able to find one of the eight children
claiming: "DCFS threw up obstacles so we couldn't see or find the
children."
More from attorney Tom
Ryan: "It would seem this is about
as bone-headed a case as it comes.
There has got to be another issue as to why the County took these
children that they are not willing to admit."
Amazing, simply
amazing. A mother and father who raised
four birth children on their own and subsequently took on eight more children
who are truly society's outcasts has them taken away due to a Juvenile Court
record reflecting hospitalization for a reason that the treating physician
indicated isn't true. Why? Apparently because of a personality conflict
between the DCFS social worker and Rachelle Henry. As was stated by San Francisco psychiatrist, Mark Levy: "What's complicated here is that things
that are medical are being mixed with bad politics [in the report]." Amazing, absolutely amazing.